Dear Reader

At Integer Wealth Global Group (IWG), we recognise that sophisticated projects require more than just a registered financial structure and rigorous risk management. They also require credibility, governance, market access, and capital delivered through a fully integrated institutional framework.
Our Level 5 Full Capitalisation Solution represents the highest standard of financial structuring and is designed for corporations and project sponsors seeking complete institutional-grade investment readiness and funding capability.

Service Level Comparison Table

Below is a comparison table between the various services and their deliverables. We understand that not all clients require a capitalised investment fund and have therefore compiled the comparatives as indicated below.

PLEASE NOTE: Costs and pricing are indicative and are subject to frequent change and alteration due to the selection of investment fund registration and their consequent listing on various jurisdictions stock exchanges across Europe, therefore the cost of these services are conditional to the influence of the jurisdiction and the regulatory variance in costs and the global exchange rates.

Please confirm costs and pricing with your IWG account manager.

Investment Structuring Service Levels

Recommended Solution

For projects seeking serious investment capital, IWG strongly recommends the Level 5 Full Capitalisation Solution, which provides a complete institutional pathway from financial structuring to capital deployment.

Why Chose the Full Capitalisation Solution - Level 5

At Integer Wealth Global Group (IWG), we recognise that sophisticated projects require more than just a registered financial structure. They require credibility, governance, market access, and capital delivered through a fully integrated institutional framework.
Our Level 5 Full Capitalisation Solution represents the highest standard of financial structuring and is designed for corporations and project sponsors seeking complete institutional-grade investment readiness and funding capability.


1. Institutional Credibility from Day One

Level 5 delivers a fully structured, regulated, and professionally governed investment vehicle.
By integrating internationally recognised institutions such as PwC or KPMG (audit), Norton Rose or DLA Piper (legal), and experienced fund managers, the fund benefits from a governance framework that meets the expectations of global investors, banks, and financial markets.

This level of credibility is critical when engaging with institutional investors, sovereign wealth funds, private equity groups, and family offices who require the highest levels of transparency and professional oversight.


2. Global Market Accessibility

With fund registration, stock exchange listing, and ISIN issuance, the investment vehicle becomes a tradable and recognisable financial instrument within the global capital markets.

This structure allows the fund to:
•  Be recognised by international financial institutions
•  Access a wider global investor base
•  Enhance liquidity and market visibility
•  Provide investors with a familiar and trusted investment framework


3. Independent Risk Validation

Level 5 includes independent asset risk assessment through internationally recognised agencies such as S&P or Moody’s.
This independent evaluation provides:
• Objective validation of project assets
• Enhanced investor confidence
• Clear risk transparency for institutional investors
• A stronger positioning when raising capital

In today’s investment environment, third-party validation is essential for attracting serious capital.


4. Comprehensive Governance & Risk Management

A robust governance structure is fundamental to long-term investment success. Through the inclusion of top-tier auditors, international legal firms, experienced fund managers, and IWG as overall risk managers, the fund operates within a multi-layered governance framework that ensures:
• Regulatory compliance
• Professional oversight of fund operations
• Transparent reporting and accountability
• Structured risk mitigation strategies

This level of governance significantly enhances investor trust and long-term sustainability.


5. Direct Capitalisation Capability

The most important advantage of Level 5 is that the fund is not simply structured — it is positioned to be capitalised.
Through IWG’s global financial network and collaborative capital partnerships, the vehicle is prepared to secure the funding required to execute the client’s project objectives.
Rather than leaving clients with a financial structure that must independently search for funding, Level 5 provides a complete pathway from structuring to capital deployment.

6. A True End-to-End Solution
Level 5 transforms a project from an idea into a fully institutionalised investment platform capable of attracting global capital.
Clients benefit from:
• Bespoke fund creation
• Global market recognition
• Independent risk validation
• Institutional governance
• Professional fund management
• Direct capitalisation capability

This end-to-end financial ecosystem ensures that projects are not only structured correctly but also positioned for successful funding and long-term growth.

NOTE: The final cost of service or product will be confirmed in accordance to the client's tailored requirement and issued accordingly in a quotation. The quotation is the valid disclosure of the cost of service and/or product provided by IWG. All external costs from external service providers will be indicated on the 'Mandate Agreement' which is issued to the client for the creation of their investment fund.

Justification for the Fund Creation Pricing Structure and Level 5 Selection

The introduction of the Fund Creation Pricing section alongside the Capital Structuring Process on the Funds page is intended to provide prospective clients with a clear and transparent understanding of the stages involved in establishing a fully structured investment fund. The purpose of this section is to illustrate the different levels within the engagement process while guiding clients through the broader sales and structuring cycle. In doing so, it highlights why the comprehensive Level 5 option represents the appropriate and most effective pathway for sponsors whose objective is to launch a fully operational and investment-ready fund.

The fund structuring process is designed as an integrated mandate, where each level represents a defined scope of work with its own contractual framework and advisory responsibilities. These levels are not modular components that can be progressively combined over time to replicate the outcome of a higher-level mandate. Each engagement level operates under a separate mandate, and therefore a client cannot initiate the process under a lesser mandate and later expand it to achieve the Level 5 outcome. Doing so would require terminating the initial mandate and re-establishing a new one, resulting in duplicated workstreams, additional legal documentation, and unnecessary administrative complexity.

From a structural and operational standpoint, the fund creation process requires a coherent capitalisation strategy from inception. Institutional investors, regulators, and professional service providers expect a fund sponsor to present a well-defined and complete structure from the beginning. This includes the investment strategy, the underlying projects or assets, governance framework, operational infrastructure, and the participation of key service providers such as administrators, custodians, legal counsel, regulators and compliance specialists. Attempting to assemble these elements progressively after the structuring process has begun introduces structural inconsistencies and can significantly delay the overall timeline.

Investor perception and institutional credibility are also critical considerations. Professional investors typically expect a fund to be presented as a fully prepared investment vehicle, with clearly defined assets, capital structure, governance model, and operational framework. A fund that appears to be constructed incrementally during the formation process may signal inadequate preparation or strategic uncertainty with an inconsistent investment and capital deployment strategy. This perception can undermine investor confidence and may discourage institutional participation.
In addition, the coordination of the broader fund ecosystem must occur in a synchronized manner. Administrators, custodians, legal advisers, compliance frameworks, and investor engagement strategies must be aligned from the outset in order to create a coherent and efficient operational structure. Introducing these components progressively at later stages would likely require repeated adjustments to documentation, restructuring of operational frameworks, and revisions to investor materials. Such inefficiencies can lead to avoidable delays, additional costs, and unnecessary execution risk.

A further consideration relates to the capital raising process itself. Investors evaluate fund opportunities based on a comprehensive view of the investment thesis, asset pipeline, governance structure, financial projections, and operational infrastructure. Presenting an incomplete or evolving structure during capital raising can create uncertainty regarding execution capability and strategic alignment. Establishing the full framework from the beginning through the Level 5 mandate allows the fund sponsor to present a credible, institutionally aligned opportunity to prospective investors.

Moreover, beginning with the comprehensive Level 5 engagement ensures that all critical strategic components—including asset integration, capital allocation, investor engagement strategy, regulatory alignment, and operational governance, are coordinated under a single mandate. This approach avoids the inefficiencies that would arise from attempting to retrofit earlier stage work into a broader structure later in the process.
For these reasons, clients whose objective is to establish a fully structured and capitalisation-ready fund are encouraged to select the Level 5 option from the outset. This ensures that the fund is designed and implemented according to institutional best practices and that all structural, operational, and investor-related elements are aligned from the beginning.

In summary, Level 5 should not be viewed simply as a higher tier of service but rather as the complete structural framework required to bring a fund to market in a professional and institutionally credible manner. Selecting this option at the start preserves the integrity of the fund formation process, avoids unnecessary duplication of work and delays, strengthens investor confidence, and provides the most efficient path toward a successful fund launch and capitalisation.